Gullo, Sara, Christine Galavotti, Anne Sebert Kuhlmann et al., “Effects of a Social Accountability Approach, CARE’s Community Score Card, on Reproductive Health-Related Outcomes in Malawi: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Evaluation,” PLOS One 12, no.2 (February 2017), doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171316

URL: journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0171316

Abstract

Background: Social accountability approaches, which emphasize mutual responsibility and accountability by community members, health care workers, and local health officials for improving health outcomes in the community, are increasingly being employed in low-resource settings. We evaluated the effects of a social accountability approach, CARE’s Community Score Card (CSC), on reproductive health outcomes in Ntcheu district, Malawi using a cluster-randomized control design.

Methods: We matched 10 pairs of communities, randomly assigning one from each pair to intervention and control arms. We conducted two independent cross-sectional surveys of women who had given birth in the last 12 months, at baseline and at two years post-baseline. Using difference-in-difference (DiD) and local average treatment effect (LATE) estimates, we evaluated the effects on outcomes including modern contraceptive use, antenatal and postnatal care service utilization, and service satisfaction. We also evaluated changes in indicators developed by community members and service providers in the intervention areas.

Results: DiD analyses showed significantly greater improvements in the proportion of women receiving a home visit during pregnancy (B = 0.20, P < .01), receiving a postnatal visit (B = 0.06, P = .01), and overall service satisfaction (B = 0.16, P < .001) in intervention compared to control areas. LATE analyses estimated significant effects of the CSC intervention on home visits by health workers (114% higher in intervention compared to control) (B = 1.14, P < .001) and current use of modern contraceptives (57% higher) (B = 0.57, P < .01). All 13 community- and provider-developed indicators improved, with 6 of them showing significant improvements.

Conclusions: By facilitating the relationship between community members, health service providers, and local government officials, the CSC contributed to important improvements in reproductive health-related outcomes. Further, the CSC builds mutual accountability, and ensures that solutions to problems are locally-relevant, locally-supported and feasible to implement.

Gullo et al. (2017) demonstrate that the chances of women and girls receiving quality reproductive and maternal healthcare increases when healthy relationships within the community are fostered. In Western contexts, which tend to focus on the physician/patient relationship, this broader approach to healthcare highlights the importance of the community advocating for the care of others.